|
Post by turner on May 3, 2015 0:48:22 GMT -5
Lol didn't mean to post that
|
|
|
Post by jake on May 3, 2015 0:50:17 GMT -5
Lol didn't mean to post that I was about to say what does T mean?
|
|
|
Post by alleen on May 3, 2015 0:59:55 GMT -5
What? T Rex?
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on May 3, 2015 1:07:44 GMT -5
Well, guys, brb. I am gonna go to McDonalds. Sorry if I acted rude. I do not trust Lissa very much especially with her post "Why does the leader matter?" since people are likely to not have leaders who they don't really trust very much (which is the reason why Renee rejected the first nominations). I was looking back and realized I wasn't very clear about what I meant there. When I said "why does the leader matter?" I meant that a group of say, Me/Jake/Skelda would not be any different whether it was me or Skelda or you or Alleen who picked it. Anyway, I guess I need to pick. Ugh. I've been debating it.
|
|
|
Post by turner on May 3, 2015 1:07:59 GMT -5
T for Traitor! Or Turner. Turner the Traitor >
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on May 3, 2015 1:47:38 GMT -5
I don't now which of jake/Alleen id send if I was aiming for an all resistance mission though.
So I guess I'll try the one we're trying to hit multiple scum with? I guess there's nothing wrong with confirmation of stuff.
If you people all have audden change of heart overnight about going for a double scum mission Hou can go ahead and reject this. Nsdinenis up next though to lead. And she's prnbably scum. Eehh. I think we should be real cautious with whatever she suggests and take it all with a grain of salt or three at Least given that shes prjbamly qhite aware how likely scum we think Se is.
Id be quite impressed if this didn't fail though if it goes through. Maybe both scum will pass it for wifom though? Hahaha i doubt it. That would be fun. At least the passing part. The resulting paranoia perhaps not so much.
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on May 3, 2015 1:52:23 GMT -5
Deploy: Lissa, Jake, Alleen, Nadine
Hope that format is okay.
I need to go sleep now.
|
|
|
Post by alleen on May 3, 2015 1:54:13 GMT -5
If you good send you, me Lizzy and Jake
|
|
|
Post by alleen on May 3, 2015 2:07:17 GMT -5
But the previous mission with me, Jake and Lissa failed so why would this go through?
|
|
|
Post by turner on May 3, 2015 2:49:22 GMT -5
Voting PhaseMISSION 3 PENDING TEAM:Lissa the "Medic" Jake the "Sniper" Alleen the "Soldier" Nadine the "Scout" (Reminder: If the team is rejected (3 or more "REJECT" votes), the current Leader is overthrown and the next Leader in line will nominate a new team) Deadline is 10 hours from now. If you do not vote before deadline, I will assume your vote is to ACCEPT the mission team.From now on, Leaders have a 6 hour deadline to nominate a new team. If they fail to nominate a full team within this time frame, they lose their leadership and the next person on the list will become Leader.
|
|
|
Post by Skelda on May 3, 2015 9:18:43 GMT -5
Okay, not sure what I'm doing.
|
|
|
Post by Skelda on May 3, 2015 9:25:16 GMT -5
Yes. It is fairly low from a realistic standpoint. But still more likely than from a probability standpoint, I think, unless I am terribly off, because reads don't figure in to random chance. And no, that sentence did not make my brain hurt. Anyway. Yeah. I see the point behind purposefully sending scummy people. And if they pass it in the hopes of not getting caught out, well that's alright, nothing is really confirmed but at least we get a difficult mission passed. I don't think it's advantageous for them to do that at this point though. I think the question is, are we fairly sure we can get the last two passed if we send this one with a bunch of scummy people and it gets failed? We don't have a huge amount of room to test things at this point, and fmpov a me/nadine/you/alleen mission getting two fails would just confirm what I already pretty strongly believe. I think it is advantageous for scum to pass this mission. If it fails, that will actually give us a lot of info. If it passes, we will get less info.
|
|
|
Post by jake on May 3, 2015 11:57:22 GMT -5
Deadline is 10 hours from now. If you do not vote before deadline, I will assume your vote is to ACCEPT the mission team.
This was stated 9 hours and I haven't really seen anybody posts. Can we at least have an extension just in case people have yet to turn in a vote?
|
|
|
Post by jake on May 3, 2015 11:57:34 GMT -5
Aside from Skelda of course
|
|
|
Post by Nadine on May 3, 2015 12:09:38 GMT -5
I am nominating next. Can we discuss that now please? I am scared I'll be asleep by the time this round has finished. I want to give it to Turner early just in case. I have to nominate 3 people.
|
|