|
|
Post by Börk Börk on Apr 17, 2015 21:07:49 GMT -5
My main read on Lala is because of her 'individuality' post. It seems a bit too much like fence-sitting, a pretty scummy thing. Then again, it also looks very much like a natural Lala post, which scores her townpoints. Unvote.
|
|
|
|
Post by Börk Börk on Apr 17, 2015 21:09:49 GMT -5
Although I'm actually feeling a Vote: Skelda to be honest. Gut feeling? Vaguely but not really. Instinct? Maybe slightly. Arbitrary spontaneity? Probably.
|
|
|
|
Post by Börk Börk on Apr 17, 2015 21:11:29 GMT -5
I do like this game format. The mechanics are similar to previous games and therefore require no real explanation but they're rather new all the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by Renée on Apr 17, 2015 21:13:16 GMT -5
Yeah I'm reading hermione as town.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on Apr 17, 2015 21:15:40 GMT -5
The chance of one person getting offered two VTs with seven in 24 cards in a vacuum is like 7.6 percent. Eight players. The exact odds would be a mess to work out, but someone getting that is definitely not implausible.
|
|
|
|
Post by Börk Börk on Apr 17, 2015 21:16:31 GMT -5
Fun fact: If we have a cop who gets a guilty result then I'm whacking that person into oblivion. If a framer hits right then they're lucky as balls. I'm not buying into any 'i wuz fr4m3d' stories.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on Apr 17, 2015 21:16:33 GMT -5
Why am I scum?
|
|
|
|
Post by Börk Börk on Apr 17, 2015 21:19:22 GMT -5
I spy with my relatively average sized eye something beginning with Lissa, ending with scum, with an is in the middle.
You're scum because of pointless setup spec. Working the odds of a double VT roll out? Why bother. Making a post saying 'Exactly.' in reply? Why. At least add something. There is so much IIoA here.
I'm not going to vote for you yet though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on Apr 17, 2015 21:23:40 GMT -5
I said "exactly" because I'd already said pretty much the same thing in different words. I like working out odds like that. I setup spec like this as both alignments, regardless of what Skelda says, and even if that wasn't the case before I've been purposely doing it as Town lately to un-scumtell it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Börk Börk on Apr 17, 2015 21:23:55 GMT -5
I hope we get a whack in today. I prefer having a two-fold smaller whack pool the next day.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on Apr 17, 2015 21:24:06 GMT -5
I've also done things aside from pointless setup spec.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on Apr 17, 2015 21:24:32 GMT -5
And not all of it is pointless.
|
|
|
|
Post by Börk Börk on Apr 17, 2015 21:26:09 GMT -5
I said "exactly" because I'd already said pretty much the same thing in different words. I like working out odds like that. I setup spec like this as both alignments, regardless of what Skelda says, and even if that wasn't the case before I've been purposely doing it as Town lately to un-scumtell it. I don't like this un-scumtelling deal. Surely the primary concept is 'act town as scum' rather than 'act scummy as town'. Past games recall posts of mine with 'policy whack' stated in them. I feel like that's getting appropriate here. |
|
|
|
Post by Börk Börk on Apr 17, 2015 21:27:10 GMT -5
And not all of it is pointless. Other than you getting role descriptions from that website mafia place, bring out the evidence. |
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on Apr 17, 2015 21:28:46 GMT -5
I am pretty sure I did it as Town before regardless, and it's not intended to be scummy. It is a thing that I do, I am just being super brazen and cheeky about it, partly to make a point and partly because I find it amusing to do so.
And I recall you being scum in said 'policy whack' game.
|
|
