|
Post by turner on May 2, 2015 16:15:33 GMT -5
New Leader:LISSA
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on May 2, 2015 16:17:44 GMT -5
Not surprised, but dang.
So I think it's Nadine/Jake. Or I guess it cold be Nadine/Alleen. Though Alleen was the one who put together the failing mission... hmm. She looks better than Jake aside from that though. And if it's Nadine/Jake she wouldn't exactly have known it would fail.
Me/Skelda/Renee/Alleen for this mission? (Not an official submission yet) does that sound good? Or swap out alleen?
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on May 2, 2015 16:19:35 GMT -5
But Jake sound geniune... Interesting.
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on May 2, 2015 16:21:18 GMT -5
Well, I guess I have somewhat of an idea on who at least one of the spies are. Just for the record, Lissa, whatever your nominations are, I probably will not accept them as I believe you are the spy most likely to reject it. Sorry. Of course you think that - you're running out of Resistance to accuse.
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on May 2, 2015 16:23:15 GMT -5
I wrote my first post on this page before I saw Jake and Alleen's last few on the last. It makes me want to think they are scm buddies but I highly soubt that mission would have failed if they were, it would've been risky for them to do that.
|
|
|
Post by jake on May 2, 2015 16:25:32 GMT -5
Also, Lissa, I know that you would likely try to reject the mission and try to put the blame on me. I know how good of a liar you are so you are gonna try to lie about your decision and put the blame on me.
If you try to think me and Alleen are spies, then Alleen would be smarter to not have me be put in the mission and not say I am acting genuine. And if I were a spy, then I would of actually been smart and know what is supposed to happen during a mission.
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on May 2, 2015 16:27:40 GMT -5
I wasn't acrually calling you scumbuddies - because of theissoon - just saying it looked like it interaction wise. Just now. Quit twisting my words. One of you is scum not both.
And not reading the opening posts isn't alignment indicative.
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on May 2, 2015 16:31:59 GMT -5
My UN shmmit is in half an hour. Talk to me! XD
|
|
|
Post by alleen on May 2, 2015 16:32:46 GMT -5
Just say who you want on the mission that we can vote
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on May 2, 2015 16:34:13 GMT -5
I wanted feedback from people first. Preferably Resistance people who actually want this liaison to pass.
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on May 2, 2015 16:35:44 GMT -5
Lol autocorrect. Liaison = mission
I intend to submit a mission before I go though. XD I just wanted to hear some thoughts first
|
|
|
Post by alleen on May 2, 2015 16:36:13 GMT -5
I wanted feedback from people first. Preferably Resistance people who actually want this liaison to pass. You not Resistance and we all know that... So go on...
|
|
|
Post by jake on May 2, 2015 16:37:55 GMT -5
Tell me Lissa. If I were a spy, then would I nominate Nadine and Alleen when the mission is likely to pass as it would be too risky for them to fail the first mission? The four-person mission is definitely the riskiest type of mission and I rather if the leader of that mission is somebody who I feel is more trustworthy who is either Renee or Skelda. It's better if we have a leader who all we trust for a majority than to have a leader of somebody who is kinda skeptical for these type of missions.
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on May 2, 2015 16:38:29 GMT -5
Jake and Alleen's insistent trust of each other is seripusly weird. Why am I scum?
|
|
|
Post by alleen on May 2, 2015 16:38:44 GMT -5
But I can't remember if i played ever with Jake when he is bad... So I can be wrong with you Lissa....
|
|