|
Post by rosey1579 on Jul 28, 2019 15:27:37 GMT -5
I got guilty on Skelda. Not very interesting.
|
|
|
Post by rosey1579 on Jul 28, 2019 15:28:18 GMT -5
What results did we all get? I got a Town on Rosey, so either Rosey or Lala is the scum. Or you
|
|
|
Post by Lala on Jul 28, 2019 15:34:20 GMT -5
Risey. Why you gotta be so paranoid lol.
Do you think that Alleen is gone fir the might.
|
|
|
Post by rosey1579 on Jul 28, 2019 15:46:27 GMT -5
Risey. Why you gotta be so paranoid lol. Do you think that Alleen is gone fir the might. Probably, yes. I will be soon, as well. I’ll stick around for as long as I can justify it, but I need my 7-8 hours, so if you want to ask me something/confess your guilt/bake me treats now’s the time.
|
|
|
Post by Lala on Jul 28, 2019 16:07:10 GMT -5
I think I’m just a sweet innocent naive person. But I can bake you some lemon poppyseed muffins.
|
|
|
Post by alleen on Jul 28, 2019 16:13:44 GMT -5
I got town on Rosey.
|
|
|
Post by Lala on Jul 28, 2019 16:28:06 GMT -5
Okey Dokey
Alleen and I are either naive or sane.
So it's either Skelda or Roseybeard.
Which 'un.
Scherazo I wish you could have told us what your results were instead of that you slept late and vote no whack, lol.
|
|
|
Post by Lala on Jul 28, 2019 16:28:41 GMT -5
IF IF IF
IF WE no whack there will be 3 left tomorrow.
Should we no whack again?
|
|
|
Post by rosey1579 on Jul 28, 2019 16:49:43 GMT -5
There’s no need to no whack again as far as I can tell
What I have so far: Skelda is either sane, making Lala scum, or lying, making him scum. Alleen must be town.
Alleen is Naive or Sane Assume by way of contradiction that Alleen is sane. If Alleen is Sane, Lala is town. If Lala is town, Skelda is bad. But the prerequisite for Lala being scum is Skelda being sane. This is a contradiction. Thus Alleen is naive.
Lala must either be sane or lying Assume by way of contradiction that’s Lala is sane This would mean Skelda is town from her investigation This is a contradiction Thus Lala is lying
Skelda must be either sane or lying Assume by way of contradiction that he is sane Lala would need to be mafia There is no contradiction here that I can see
So it must be Lala
Vote: Lala
QED
|
|
|
Post by rosey1579 on Jul 28, 2019 16:51:04 GMT -5
Someone please check through that for me. It’s the only thing that makes sense but having said that I am very tired so errors are possible
|
|
|
Post by Lala on Jul 28, 2019 16:56:46 GMT -5
I don't care. Vote phor me Rosey, lol.
VOTE: ROSEY
I am a darn cop, but it's Sunday night. I also didn't read your post because it was long. But I'll read back.
Also, iph you are not maphia and Skelda is, it is your phault we lose. How can you even consider me? I am the most townish player here.
|
|
|
Post by Lala on Jul 28, 2019 16:57:09 GMT -5
and yes, i'm voting rosey because she voted me. I dono't care.
|
|
|
Post by Lala on Jul 28, 2019 17:00:07 GMT -5
There’s no need to no whack again as far as I can tell What I have so far: Skelda is either sane, making Lala scum, or lying, making him scum. Alleen must be town. Alleen is Naive or Sane Assume by way of contradiction that Alleen is sane. If Alleen is Sane, Lala is town. If Lala is town, Skelda is bad. But the prerequisite for Lala being scum is Skelda being sane. This is a contradiction. Thus Alleen is naive. Lala must either be sane or lying Assume by way of contradiction that’s Lala is sane This would mean Skelda is town from her investigation This is a contradiction Thus Lala is lying Skelda must be either sane or lying Assume by way of contradiction that he is sane Lala would need to be mafia There is no contradiction here that I can see
So it must be Lala Vote: LalaQED EPH What about the phact I AM TOWN
|
|
|
Post by Lala on Jul 28, 2019 17:00:58 GMT -5
There’s no need to no whack again as far as I can tell What I have so far: Skelda is either sane, making Lala scum, or lying, making him scum. Alleen must be town. Alleen is Naive or Sane Assume by way of contradiction that Alleen is sane. If Alleen is Sane, Lala is town. If Lala is town, Skelda is bad. But the prerequisite for Lala being scum is Skelda being sane. This is a contradiction. Thus Alleen is naive. Lala must either be sane or lyingAssume by way of contradiction that’s Lala is sane This would mean Skelda is town from her investigation This is a contradiction Thus Lala is lying Skelda must be either sane or lying Assume by way of contradiction that he is sane Lala would need to be mafia There is no contradiction here that I can see So it must be Lala Vote: LalaQED Why can I not be NAIVE?
|
|
|
Post by Lala on Jul 28, 2019 17:04:19 GMT -5
There’s no need to no whack again as far as I can tell What I have so far: Skelda is either sane, making Lala scum, or lying, making him scum. Alleen must be town. Alleen is Naive or Sane Assume by way of contradiction that Alleen is sane. If Alleen is Sane, Lala is town. If Lala is town, Skelda is bad. But the prerequisite for Lala being scum is Skelda being sane. This is a contradiction. Thus Alleen is naive. Lala must either be sane or lying Assume by way of contradiction that’s Lala is sane This would mean Skelda is town from her investigation This is a contradiction Thus Lala is lying Skelda must be either sane or lying Assume by way of contradiction that he is sane Lala would need to be mafia There is no contradiction here that I can see So it must be Lala Vote: LalaQED Lala's Results: Skelda = Town Alleen = Town Those cannot be naive resutls, can they? How could I have even considered I might be naive
|
|