|
Post by rosey1579 on Jul 15, 2016 1:09:02 GMT -5
I dont bus my partners, thats a horrible strategy. If this is in response to my query then that's fairly sketch.
|
|
|
Post by rosey1579 on Jul 15, 2016 1:09:49 GMT -5
Either way, where's my muffins?
|
|
|
Post by alleen on Jul 15, 2016 1:18:55 GMT -5
I dont bus my partners, thats a horrible strategy. If this is in response to my query then that's fairly sketch. yep... don't believe him... I've got first hand experience of that...
|
|
|
Post by alleen on Jul 15, 2016 1:19:43 GMT -5
Either way, where's my muffins? The muffin man went to bed...
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on Jul 15, 2016 1:34:52 GMT -5
I rate we no whack and let investigators check Harry tonight. Harry is a silly check, pick someone nuller And letting that resolve him is boringly passive
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on Jul 15, 2016 1:35:27 GMT -5
I dont bus my partners, thats a horrible strategy.
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on Jul 15, 2016 1:35:55 GMT -5
Do you want to just rely on the investigative roles for everything
Because I don't
|
|
|
Post by alleen on Jul 15, 2016 1:35:57 GMT -5
Is there a vote count?
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on Jul 15, 2016 1:36:38 GMT -5
With Skelda though, he usually makes more sense about whacking. whacking someone just because they usually die in a game is a weird tactic, especially for D1. I can understand whacking someone who isn't around later in the game so they don't make it to final 3 potentially. That makes more sense. This kind of logic is not typical Skelda town logic. Maybe he is in a weird mood or something but he isn't even on the chopping block officially and he is fighting for his life as though he is. He has expressed similar lines of thought recently
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on Jul 15, 2016 1:38:52 GMT -5
the nature of his posting in that game is significantly different imo
|
|
|
Post by rosey1579 on Jul 15, 2016 1:50:56 GMT -5
Do you want to just rely on the investigative roles for everything Because I don't They are tools at our disposal. It'd be a mistake not to use them.
|
|
|
Post by rosey1579 on Jul 15, 2016 1:51:25 GMT -5
Not the people, the roles are the tools.
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on Jul 15, 2016 1:52:55 GMT -5
Do you want to just rely on the investigative roles for everything Because I don't They are tools at our disposal. It'd be a mistake not to use them. I certainly don't disagree with using them as tools, just with being solely/overly reliant on them which is very much what "investigate instead of whack" is to me, we are capable of making reads independent of investigation and acting on them
|
|
|
Post by rosey1579 on Jul 15, 2016 1:56:54 GMT -5
They are tools at our disposal. It'd be a mistake not to use them. I certainly don't disagree with using them as tools, just with being solely/overly reliant on them which is very much what "investigate instead of whack" is to me, we are capable of making reads independent of investigation and acting on them Which we have. But I don't see the problem with making certain. There have been many Day One leads which have proved incorrect. If we have the ability to confirm them then we ought to.
|
|
|
Post by Lissa on Jul 15, 2016 1:59:53 GMT -5
But see if we whack and then investigate someone else we learn about two people
And the first one is probably scum so the investigation is kind of a waste
If I had a check tonight I know it wouldn't be on harry
|
|